It is hard to decide when to leave our safe haven without risk. A pandemic that has struck fear into the lives of people and businesses as a whole. The economy is yet to revive back to its usual days, but it’s uncertain. Implementing policies cannot promise accurate results for both policymakers and industries. The cases keep increasing each day and hospitals are crossing red flags. It is certain that before making a major hit in an area, the chances of occurrence are two weeks prior. But can intelligent machines predict the pandemic’s next move? Bizarre as it seems, the development of such a machine has emerged. Thanks to technology.
A group of international scientists collaborated to create a model, which is still in its making, can predict a surge in the cases two weeks before in order to take effective measures. In a paper posted on Thursday on arXiv.org, the team, led by Mauricio Santillana and Nicole Kogan of Harvard, presented an algorithm that registered danger 14 days or more before case counts begin to increase. The system uses real-time monitoring of Twitter, Google searches, and mobility data from smartphones, among other data streams.
According to the researchers, the algorithm can serve as a thermostat detecting cooling and heating system among people to guide irregular impulses of public health intervention. Santillana states that the machine is unlike any other model that makes a biased conclusion based on assumptions. The attempt is to make the algorithm perfectly accurate based on observations and recognize immediate changes in human health behavior that can trigger a sign of the virus. The key logic is to make conclusions without assumptions and attain accurate results.
The use of real-time data analysis to gauge disease progression dates back to 2008 when engineers at Google developed a tool that could detect chances of visits to a doctor for flu by tracking the search for keywords that indicated symptoms of flu such as pain in the muscle, cough or nausea. But as it was known Google Flu Trend Analysis, yes that’s how it is named, was poorly performed. It overestimated doctor visitations because it disregarded the fact that most of the searches were influenced by outside factors or media attention which could possibly create mere interest in people and not actually having flu.
Endless efforts from analysts and scientists to develop a technology that can provide accurate data regarding health visits by using the data of users through searches they make, pages they visit, etc. are tedious and complicated but never impossible. Scientists from outside who reviewed the supposedly Corona predicting model called it “that alternative, next-gen data sources may provide early signals of rising COVID-19 prevalence”. If this turns out to be a success, then we will be several steps further in vanishing Covid-19 from the face of the earth.
